Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Adrian Guldemond's avatar

Technocracy was a popular concept in the chaotic 1920s and 30s as one alternative solution to the Communists, who had their own vision, centralized state planning to create wealth.

Thanks for reminding us of the old Tphil plan and noting that China is well advanced on this model. History is replete with other Utopian schemes which failed at a cost.

The current Western obsession with the economic results of the AI revolution should shift to concern about the political ramifications- which are far more invasive and long term. The Danes can be persuaded to make a deal on Greenland. Our new Canadian Prime Minister also knows how to cut deals on the car industry. All good.

The problem is not whether the ruling class has a plan for the rest of us, but whether the elite can be held accountable if they screw up... as they often have.

That is why good political systems are more crucial than economic ones.

Expand full comment
George Woloshyn's avatar

Fascinating piece, Diane. Although my gut reaction, at the outset, would be to fume against such fundamental changes in the social order that are initiated by an "elite" class for the rest of us members of the "lumpen proletariat," I'm not convinced that we have the luxury of discounting them altogether. Automation, AI, and robots pose a near-term threat to millions of people now gainfully employed, even in such complex professions as medicine and law. As employees are "let go" because technology provides non-human and cheaper, more dependable alternatives, who is to employ them? But without jobs, they will become either a passive welfare class awaiting minimal payments and ready to accept socialist/communist "solutions" or a source of continuing disruption and discontent. Maybe engineers and scientists can do a better job than lawyers.

Yes, I know the old "bromide" about the horse and buggy being replaced by the even larger employable potential of automobiles, but - when "production" is largely automated and material needs are supplied by machines how many "robot repair" jobs will there be to absorb the surplus before other robots will be built to replace the human "fixers"?

As usual, Diane, you provide such breathtakingly interesting global insights that are not otherwise available and offer rich food for thought.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts