Discussion about this post

User's avatar
George Woloshyn's avatar

The insights you share with us are very heartening, Diane, in that they expose the dirty underbelly of societies that - on the surface - appear to be fearsome threats to free societies. But, despite all the poorly structured and ultimately collapsing economic projects and domestic "bankruptcies" that they and their clients end up with, China has acquired a stranglehold on the targeted nations......if not the people than the corrupt leaders who are now beholden to them. And that may be considered a "silent" invasion and victory. As you correctly note, the Chinese are not flexible in adjusting their terms to accommodate their clients because occupying powers seldom concern themselves with the well-being of the nations they occupy. Financial controls from a distance may work well enough to achieve their goals through the governments they corrupted.....without having to support standing occupying armies and incur open opposition from the populace. Consider how effectively the Russians have "enjoyed" the benefits of occupation in Crimea and Donbas without having to station their troops there. It is enough that they control those areas through the governments they corrupt.

Or consider the recent revelation of dozens of former high-level French officials who are pro-Putin and countering Macron's efforts to increase support for Ukraine. Or Trump and his crazies who are doing the Kremlin's bidding and frustrating the president and the majority of Congress from helping Ukraine. How much did that cost the Kremlin? Compromising videos? Envelopes filled with cash? Loans through third-party banks to keep businesses afloat? A celebrated standing in Russia and global notoriety to those who would otherwise be viewed as twits? A security force to guard an unpopular regime?

There are as many ways to invade, occupy, and control countries as there are ways to "skin a cat" {? :-)}

Let us hope and pray that the Chinese have simply made some very bad financial mistakes and that their house of cards will collapse on them......but perhaps not.

Expand full comment
John Bruner's avatar

While reading this I realized it was much more than commentary on economics and international relations. It is a description of how power and money interact with human nature to show how greed among the powerful is a fundamental fly in the ointment of relationships between people and nations. It clarifies the need for competent regulation to keep the players focused on the success of the endeavour rather than on their own personal advantage. It's a lesson that the rich and powerful have been trying to put behind a screen of political hogwash.

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts