Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Walter Rothschild's avatar

Quite right ! Excellent !

The "follow the money" suggestion is surely the most viable solution. Since so much is known about patrimony of the bad actors, does it make sense to incentivize cyber sleuths and whistleblowers to find the money by offering them huge rewards based on a percentage of whatever is recovered ? It seems to me that cyber sleuths and whistleblowers are better at this than most law enforcement agencies.

Regarding the "template" comments, they are obviously well founded. How can the world deal with such a threat ? Must there be enhanced security and surveillance to thwart future 9/11 and 10/7 attacks ? And how should democracies deal with perpetrators be they individuals, organizations or states ? Are the current legal approaches still valid in when dealing with such threats ? We already live in a Kafkaesque and 1984 world, must we tolerate more controls over our daily lives to enable us to live in peace and thwart bad actors ? Since sanctions and limited military strikes are not severely hurting the bad actors nor thwarting their nefarious conduct what will work ? Over to your readers !

Expand full comment
Ian Gallimore's avatar

There can be little doubt of the validity of the charges against Hamas and its leaders as set out in this piece. One is left, therefore, to wonder why the government of Israel has found it valuable to continue to fund Hamas, proudly justifying this support as being of benefit to the state of Israel. One also wonders why the people of Gaza, and their housing and social infrastructure have been so aggressively targeted by the Israeli war machine, when, clearly, it is the leadership, living like kings in countries well within reach of Israeli arms or covert operations, who are the problem, or so we are led to believe. There is much going on here which is, apparently, beyond investigation or discussion. That is truly a shame.

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts