Discussion about this post

User's avatar
George Woloshyn's avatar

You're probably right, Diane, in your conclusions as to how this will end up. And, yes, the comments about justification for the war are very damning and can never be taken back. But it all seems just a bit too orchestrated. Although Prigorzhin's popularity has gone up because of his straight talk, Putin is still very popular. And it is hard to imagine that Putin would have allowed Prigorzhin to build up his forces and stature without taking action earlier. If there is one thing that Putin is can sniff out, it is a challenger to his power. Remember, the western world had been duped for decades by stories about hawks vs. doves in the Soviet politburo, until - after the demise of the USSR - it was learned that there were no such divisions at the top.

The other thing that troubles me is that Prigorzhin's decision to challenge Putin was, apparently, a missile that fell on his troops. He accuses the russian military but the russians deny it. And, as of now, there is no "evidence" of such a firing. It would not be too far-fetched for both Ps to later "find" that Ukrainians were "responsible".

Final point: in addition to his regular military and a host of other "syloviki" at his disposal, Putin has a praetorian guard of close to 100,000. If you recall from history, the emperor's praetorian guard were the "kingmakers" and Putin's are loyal to him alone. Could this "mutiny" end up in a quick collapse (if it is a mutiny) and then a period of blood-letting as Putin goes about cleaning house of all those disloyal to him and doubles down on Ukraine?

Just some thoughts from someone who mistrusts everything about putin and russia...even the "obvious"

Expand full comment
L. G. Anderson's avatar

I am watching BBC now - this is going to be a massive change & hopefully the RU people will see how cruel & a lier Putin is - the support of oligarchs & the death of their sons for nothing!

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts