13 Comments

Even if the timing and duration of global warming are exaggerated, the desire to decrease pollution and smog by renewable energy should still be promoted and encouraged.

Expand full comment

Good. Press, politicians and purchased scientists - classic bandwagon effect.....all climbing aboard cause it's the latest thing....even if it's going nowhere.

Expand full comment

“Science”? Nope. These are hard-nosed, steely-eyed practitioners of power games. This is an assorted bunch of born gangsters, psychopaths, empire-builders, closeted totalitarians and other predatory individuals who see in the rest of humanity a mere canvass for their self-realization.

Expand full comment

Great article......I just completed read Erik Larson book "Isaac's Storm" which is an account of the great Hurricane which destroyed Galveston on September 8, 1900. This storm has been described as the "Deadliest Hurricane in history"and took 8000 lives. Those so called "climate scientists" who use recent significant hurricanes as evidence as to man made climate issues, need to read this book. I suppose that now you have exposed yourself as a "denier or outlier"" you too can expect to be pilloried, shamed and possibly punished by the pseudo climate scientist and their enabling media.

Expand full comment

Thank you Diane . . . So much

CO2 . . . Nature 97 % . . . . Man 3 % . . . . . The Paris accord 0.6 %

A justifiable disdain for wide-spread pollution that is totally out of control has led to our current, well founded narrative, conducted by Politicians and Environmental Advocates World Wide. Unfortunately, that narrative has been hijacked by ‘Spin Doctors’ and their allies in the Environmental Movement and the Media. Humanity has been hypnotized into believing that CO2 is causing Climate Change. Environmentalists the world over have taken over the socio-political narrative with an easy, unsubstantiated view that CO2 is the New Devil to be defeated

So many things have been blamed on ’Man-Made’ Climate Change that anything, even remotely plausible is gladly accepted as fact by the masses. Warming Oceans, chunks falling off of Antarctica, forest fires, melting Glaciers, extreme storms, drought, even locusts are blamed on Man’s messing with nature by burning fossil fuels and the resultant elevated CO2 . . . All of these things could be Man-Made, if we have heard anything the Evangelical Environmentalists have been telling us for the last 20 years, yes.

When Nature and Science get a voice from History, most if not all of what we are hearing about Climate Change can be seen over and over from the pages of History. All the ‘Climate Change’ we are seeing today has happened before. The Roman Warming Period and The Middle Ages Warming Period are both recorded in writing and from Ice Core sampling. The purveyors of our current Narrative on Climate Change have chosen NOT to view these records as relevant. ‘Everyone knows it’s Man-Made’.

History and Modern Science will have a voice. Naturel cycles on Planet Earth will regain credence for their frequency and their Power to Change the World. Volcanoes on land and below the Oceans will demonstrate Nature’s power to cause Global Cooling and Global Warming and reinstate Nature’s dominant roll in Climate Change. Humans are no more likely to influence Climate Change with CO2, than setting off an Atomic Bomb will alter the Earth’s path as it circles the Sun . . .

Jim Le Maistre

Expand full comment

The earth will get absorbed by the sun in about 500 million years plus or minus a few. By then Elon Musk's outcrop on Mars will be fully functional and vibrant. The earths cycles are induced by movements in our plate tectonics, which effects the summer solstice and aligns it with the aphelion. Glaciation occurs every 100,000 years , we are probably in the middle of a cycle, but who is counting. Isn't Wikipedia wonderful ;)

Expand full comment

From Koonin its all about ozone depletion. As the sun regenerates ozone, hopefully faster than we destroy it, then we should be back to normal concentrations by 2070. I don't think I will be around to see it though. Australia is forecasting an increase of 150 Terawatts of electricity will be required to fully convert. I assume its about 1500 Terawatts or a 1.5 petawatts for the USA maybe about 60 nuclear power stations. Or maybe a boatload of wind turbines.

Expand full comment

Does this mean that once Trudeau and Dougie Ford say it’s ok I can use my bbq for a family gathering? Great article. Definitely assists me in the on going debate with teenage grand kids!!

Expand full comment